IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcjaxx/v8y2020i3p435-469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mixed-ownership reform and auditor choice: evidence from listed state-owned enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Liangyin Chen
  • Jun Huang
  • Xinyuan Chen

Abstract

Based on data of state-owned enterprises listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges from 2003 to 2017, this study examines how mixed-ownership reform affects a company’s auditor choice from the perspectives of ownership structure and governance. We find that the higher the degree of mixed-ownership reform of state-owned enterprises, the more inclined they are to choose international ‘big four’ accounting firms as auditors. Further, this effect is more pronounced for firms in high competition industries, in low marketisation regions and with low information transparency. Notably, mixed-ownership reform increases financial constraints of state-owned enterprises. The results of a mediation test suggest that mixed-ownership reform improves the accounting information quality of state-owned enterprises through the choice of auditors. Our study enriches the literature of mixed-ownership reform and auditor choice and provides empirical evidence of the economic consequences of mixed-ownership reform, which is relevant for guiding future state-owned enterprises reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Liangyin Chen & Jun Huang & Xinyuan Chen, 2020. "Mixed-ownership reform and auditor choice: evidence from listed state-owned enterprises," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 435-469, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:8:y:2020:i:3:p:435-469
    DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2021.1921975
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21697213.2021.1921975
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21697213.2021.1921975?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:8:y:2020:i:3:p:435-469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcja .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.