IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcjaxx/v6y2018i3p275-294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Registration address change and corporate cost stickiness: from the perspective of policy preference and policy burden

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Quan
  • Lina Yan
  • Lei Liu

Abstract

A change of corporate registration address will directly affect the development of listed firms, and also the districts in and out of which the firms move, thereby ultimately leading to the reallocation of capital resources. Therefore, corporate registration address change attracts great attention from the theoretical and practical circles. From the perspective of policy preference and policy burden, using the sample of Chinese A-share listed firms that have experienced trans-provincial change in their registration address from 2000 to 2016, this study investigates the impact of registration address change on corporate cost stickiness and the mechanism through which registration address change affects corporate cost stickiness. The results indicate that: (1) with many factors controlled, registration address change greatly enhances corporate cost stickiness; (2) in the discussion of the mechanism, it is found that the increased policy preference and the aggravated policy burden are two ways via which registration address change affects cost stickiness. Therefore, for listed firms that experience both policy preference and policy burden simultaneously because of their registration address change, their cost stickiness increases the most. The study not only enriches the current literature on the economic consequences of registration address change, links corporate registration with cost management, and enlarges the scope of corporate cost management; it also has practical significance for corporate registration management and political resource allocation in China as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Quan & Lina Yan & Lei Liu, 2018. "Registration address change and corporate cost stickiness: from the perspective of policy preference and policy burden," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 275-294, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:6:y:2018:i:3:p:275-294
    DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2018.1560131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21697213.2018.1560131
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21697213.2018.1560131?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:6:y:2018:i:3:p:275-294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcja .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.