IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcjaxx/v5y2017i1p28-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Private placement and abnormal corporate payouts: evidence from large stock dividends

Author

Listed:
  • Chenyu Cui
  • Yunsen Chen
  • Dengjin Zheng

Abstract

Dividends should be used as the way firms reward their investors, but in the Chinese stock market, large stock dividends have been criticised for several years. In this paper, through a case study and large-sample empirical tests, we find that large stock dividends are used to cater to investors participating in a firm’s private placement. Further empirical tests document that during the unlocking periods of privately issued new shares, firms are more likely to pay large stock dividends, especially when outside private placement investors are able to sell their shares. Additional tests reveal that private placement investors do make stock sales after receiving large stock dividends. Furthermore, firms undertaking large stock dividends after private placement have more frequent connected-party transactions, are more tunnelled by other receivables and have more aggressive earnings management and lower investment efficiencies, implying that the governance role of private placement is largely attenuated because of large stock dividends. Large stock dividends after private placement are also shown to be opportunistic behaviour and irrelevant to future performance in our study. Overall, the large stock dividends result in wealth transferring between insiders and ordinary investors, and further reduce the efficiency of resource allocation in the Chinese capital market. From the results we insist that regulators should encourage cash dividends and keep a close eye on potential abuse through large stock dividends.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenyu Cui & Yunsen Chen & Dengjin Zheng, 2017. "Private placement and abnormal corporate payouts: evidence from large stock dividends," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 28-49, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:5:y:2017:i:1:p:28-49
    DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2017.1292717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21697213.2017.1292717
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21697213.2017.1292717?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:5:y:2017:i:1:p:28-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcja .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.