IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcjaxx/v4y2016i2p165-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study of the economic consequences of China’s product recalls using food and drug recalls as examples

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng Li
  • Feng Guan
  • Suihuan Zheng
  • Zengquan Li

Abstract

The economic consequences of product recalls include the short-term market reactions of investors, the reputation recovery mechanism adopted by the management of the recalling company and the long-term value relevance of the recalling company. Forty-one food and drug recalls by Chinese-listed companies between 2007 and 2012 were selected as the research sample. Using companies in the same industry as paired data, 1534 pairings were obtained. The study findings show that investors had negative reactions to food or drug recall incidents during a short event window; that the recalls had a negative externality on other companies in the same industry; that companies that performed voluntary recalls engaged in reputation recovery behaviour; and that companies that performed voluntary recalls possessed better long-term value relevance than their peers in the same industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng Li & Feng Guan & Suihuan Zheng & Zengquan Li, 2016. "A study of the economic consequences of China’s product recalls using food and drug recalls as examples," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 165-182, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:165-182
    DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2016.1196060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21697213.2016.1196060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21697213.2016.1196060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:165-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcja .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.