IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v27y2024i7p1064-1077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stay or travel? Spatial heterogeneity impact of air pollution on travel intention

Author

Listed:
  • Xianting Cao
  • Honglei Zhang
  • Mengqing Wang
  • Xiao Xiao
  • Yang Yang

Abstract

Air pollution help shape people's travel preferences and behaviour, and when facing air pollution, individuals may consider travelling out for a short or long time as a coping strategy. We apply a Geographically Weighted Negative Binomial Regression (GWNBR) to analyze the effects of air pollution on people's travel intentions from origins. Our research covers 332 prefecture-level cities across China and collects daily air quality index (AQI), the Baidu indexes of ‘tourism’, and weather data from 2015 and 2018. The results show that AQI is positively associated with people's willingness to travel, and the long-term threat of air deterioration will strengthen people's willingness to flee. We estimate a series of GWNBR models with different air pollutants and cities with varying levels of air quality. The distribution of GWNBR regression results shows a more obvious strip characteristic, with coefficients of AQI in most cities are positive. Residents in cities with better air quality are more sensitive to air deterioration, compared with the residents in heavily polluted cities, who demonstrate a higher tolerance to air pollution. Finally, we provide the theoretical and practical implications of these effects on tourism.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianting Cao & Honglei Zhang & Mengqing Wang & Xiao Xiao & Yang Yang, 2024. "Stay or travel? Spatial heterogeneity impact of air pollution on travel intention," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(7), pages 1064-1077, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:27:y:2024:i:7:p:1064-1077
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2023.2197199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2023.2197199
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2023.2197199?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:27:y:2024:i:7:p:1064-1077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.