IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v27y2024i6p864-872.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can ecotourism development promote residents’ environmental concern: a quasi-natural experiment from China

Author

Listed:
  • Yun Tong
  • Li Pang

Abstract

Destination residents’ environmental concern (REC) is a pivotal force in promoting sustainable destination development. However, empirical evidence on how ecotourism development affects REC is scarce within the framework of tourism economics. Based on a quasi-natural experiment of China’s National Ecotourism Demonstration Area (CNEDA) designation, we fill this gap using multi-source data of 282 Chinese prefecture-level cities from 2011 to 2019. The evidence indicates that CNEDA designation significantly promotes destination REC and passes the robustness tests, but this effect is short-term. The positive impact is amplified in tourism-dependent cities. The impact of ecotourism development on REC is structurally different, favouring promote residents’ ecological values and environmental cognitions over environmental behavioural intention. Relevant policy implications are also provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Yun Tong & Li Pang, 2024. "Can ecotourism development promote residents’ environmental concern: a quasi-natural experiment from China," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 864-872, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:27:y:2024:i:6:p:864-872
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2023.2271632
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2023.2271632
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2023.2271632?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:27:y:2024:i:6:p:864-872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.