IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v24y2021i1p98-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The income elasticity gap and its implications for economic growth and tourism development: the Balearic vs the Canary Islands

Author

Listed:
  • Federico Inchausti-Sintes
  • Augusto Voltes-Dorta
  • Pere Suau-Sánchez

Abstract

The Balearic and the Canary Islands are two well-known tourism-led economies. They both experienced a tourism boom during the same decades, and, hence, they developed a similar productive-mix. Nevertheless, there are strong economic differences between the two regions. While the Balearic Islands enjoy a high GDP per capita, the Canary Islands show a more modest performance. The results of a panel data regression confirm our hypothesis that they differ substantially in terms of income elasticity of tourism. It is two times higher in the Balearic Islands than in the Canaries, which indicates the first is perceived as a more luxurious destination. Furthermore, the results of a dynamic computable general equilibrium model show that the Canaries would converge in GDP per capita with the Balearic Islands if they attracted tourists with a similar profile as the latter.

Suggested Citation

  • Federico Inchausti-Sintes & Augusto Voltes-Dorta & Pere Suau-Sánchez, 2021. "The income elasticity gap and its implications for economic growth and tourism development: the Balearic vs the Canary Islands," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 98-116, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:24:y:2021:i:1:p:98-116
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2020.1722618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2020.1722618
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2020.1722618?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:24:y:2021:i:1:p:98-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.