IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v23y2020i20p2572-2584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining the gap in the image of tourist destinations through the content of and exposure to secondary sources of information

Author

Listed:
  • Asunción Beerli-Palacio
  • Josefa D. Martín-Santana

Abstract

This work focuses on studying how secondary information sources that tourists have encountered before visiting a destination influence the gap in the image formed pre and post visit. For this purpose, (1) a classification of secondary information sources according to their greater or lesser information content, and whether the tourist actively searches for or is passively exposed to them, was proposed; and (2) a model explaining how different types of information sources and their perceived quality influence the image gap was empirically validated. The results show that the greater the number of high-content information sources consulted through active searching, the lower the gap in the cognitive image. In contrast, low-content information sources consumed through passive exposure generated a greater gap in the cognitive image. Furthermore, the degree to which these secondary information sources, actively sought, were perceived to be of quality negatively influenced the gap in the cognitive image, whereas the level of perceived quality of those sources to which tourists are passively exposed positively influenced the gap in the cognitive image.

Suggested Citation

  • Asunción Beerli-Palacio & Josefa D. Martín-Santana, 2020. "Explaining the gap in the image of tourist destinations through the content of and exposure to secondary sources of information," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(20), pages 2572-2584, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:23:y:2020:i:20:p:2572-2584
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2019.1658726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2019.1658726
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2019.1658726?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:23:y:2020:i:20:p:2572-2584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.