IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcejxx/v9y2016i2p116-139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: Multilateralism on the Silk Road

Author

Listed:
  • Mike Callaghan
  • Paul Hubbard

Abstract

Initial English-language media coverage of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) was framed in terms of strategic rivalry between China and the United States and China’s frustration with slow reform to existing multilateral development banks (MDBs). But the United States, not China, turned the AIIB into a battle for global influence, which the United States lost when key allies joined the bank.China had a positive agenda for establishing the AIIB, particularly as part of its flagship ‘one belt, one road’ regional initiative. By establishing a multilateral lender for Asian infrastructure, China can de-politicize what can be fraught bilateral financing deals as well as boost its image in the region. This requires the AIIB being a truly multilateral institution.The AIIB will have to meet the standards of other MDBs, particularly for safeguards, procurement and transparency. The bank will be under international scrutiny and AIIB shareholders should build the bank cautiously, initially focusing on co-financing with other MDBs. The AIIB need not mirror existing lenders, but can learn from their experience and improve on their efficiency. The AIIB will be a learning experience for China and could boost its credentials for future multilateral leadership.

Suggested Citation

  • Mike Callaghan & Paul Hubbard, 2016. "The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: Multilateralism on the Silk Road," China Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 116-139, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcejxx:v:9:y:2016:i:2:p:116-139
    DOI: 10.1080/17538963.2016.1162970
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17538963.2016.1162970
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17538963.2016.1162970?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcejxx:v:9:y:2016:i:2:p:116-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcej .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.