IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcejxx/v15y2022i1p60-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of the recent USA and China trade dispute on China’s aquatic products

Author

Listed:
  • Kun Lu
  • Pierre Failler
  • Benjamin M. Drakeford
  • Qinyi Wang
  • Tong Liu

Abstract

This paper uses the Multivariable Grey Model and the Counterfactual Reasoning Method to evaluate the impact of the recent trade dispute between the USA and China from the perspective of its impact on the international trade of China’s aquatic products. Regarding imports the recent trade dispute did not have a negative impact, due to substitution possibilities with other countries. China’s aquatic products export is heavily dependent on the market in the USA. Nevertheless, the aggravation of the recent trade dispute has not caused significant effects on China’s aquatic product exports. Compared with the potential trade loss in terms of exports to China suffered by aquatic product producers and operators in the USA, the economic interests of China’s aquatic products producers and operators in terms of exports have not been affected significantly overall. In comparison, the potential trade losses of aquatic product producers and operators in the USA are relatively greater.

Suggested Citation

  • Kun Lu & Pierre Failler & Benjamin M. Drakeford & Qinyi Wang & Tong Liu, 2022. "Impacts of the recent USA and China trade dispute on China’s aquatic products," China Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 60-76, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcejxx:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:60-76
    DOI: 10.1080/17538963.2021.2019924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17538963.2021.2019924
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17538963.2021.2019924?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcejxx:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:60-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcej .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.