IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcejxx/v12y2019i3p352-368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entropy-based China income distributions and inequality measures

Author

Listed:
  • Qiuzi Fu
  • Sofia B. Villas-Boas
  • George Judge

Abstract

We use information theoretic information recovery methods, on a 2005 sample of household income data from the Chinese InterCensus, to estimate the income distribution for China and each of its 31 provinces and to obtain corresponding measures of income inequality. Using entropy divergence methods, we seek a probability density function solution that is as close to a uniform probability distribution of income (with the least inequality), as the data will permit. These entropy measures of income inequality reflect how the allocation and distribution systems are performing, and we show the advantages of investigating province variation in income inequality using entropy measures rather than Gini coefficients. Finally, we use a sample of data from the China Family Panel Study to recover an estimate of the 2010 and the 2016 to investigate possible directions of inequality changes using these different additional data sources, given that the 2015 Inter-Census is not yet available.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiuzi Fu & Sofia B. Villas-Boas & George Judge, 2019. "Entropy-based China income distributions and inequality measures," China Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 352-368, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcejxx:v:12:y:2019:i:3:p:352-368
    DOI: 10.1080/17538963.2019.1570620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17538963.2019.1570620
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17538963.2019.1570620?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcejxx:v:12:y:2019:i:3:p:352-368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcej .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.