IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcejxx/v10y2017i3p341-361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-movement and spillovers: empirical evidence from BRIC equity markets

Author

Listed:
  • Amanjot Singh
  • Manjit Singh

Abstract

A higher degree of co-movement and spillover effects among different asset classes undermine portfolio diversification benefits. In this regard, the present study attempts to capture dynamic co-movement and return-volatility spillover effects among the most promising emerging equity markets, i.e. Brazil, Russia, India and China in a multivariate framework by employing VAR-ABEKK and VAR-DCC-AGARCH (1,1) models. To further comprehend the behaviour of the correlation coefficients during the global financial crisis period (2007–2009), heat map and Markov regime switching model (two regimes with a switch at ‘mean’ level only) have been used. The results report that the BRIC equity markets do not share a common stochastic trend in the long run. There is strong evidence of market shocks to volatility, volatility to volatility and negative shocks to volatility spillover effects among the BRIC markets. Overall, the BRIC markets are partially integrated with each other, thereby making them stronger investment candidates.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanjot Singh & Manjit Singh, 2017. "Co-movement and spillovers: empirical evidence from BRIC equity markets," China Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 341-361, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcejxx:v:10:y:2017:i:3:p:341-361
    DOI: 10.1080/17538963.2017.1370158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17538963.2017.1370158
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17538963.2017.1370158?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcejxx:v:10:y:2017:i:3:p:341-361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcej .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.