IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rbalxx/v53y2022i2p187-210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behavior of calendar anomalies and the adaptive market hypothesis: evidence from the Baltic stock markets

Author

Listed:
  • Vilija Aleknevičienė
  • Vaida Klasauskaitė
  • Eglė Aleknevičiūtė

Abstract

This research tests the Adaptive Market Hypothesis (AMH) regarding calendar anomalies in the Baltic stock markets. Analysis of known calendar anomalies over time is carried out by using sub-sample GARCH (1,1) regression with Kruskal–Wallis statistics and rolling windows. Three calendar anomalies were confirmed in these markets: Friday, MoY (July and January), and ToM (turn-of-the-month). The Baltic stock markets demonstrated behavior supporting the AMH. It was found that the opportunity to earn abnormal returns on investment strategies based on Friday, July, and ToM effects disappeared during the financial crisis of 2007–9. The Friday and the ToM effects follow a more time-varying pattern, while the July effect is less so.

Suggested Citation

  • Vilija Aleknevičienė & Vaida Klasauskaitė & Eglė Aleknevičiūtė, 2022. "Behavior of calendar anomalies and the adaptive market hypothesis: evidence from the Baltic stock markets," Journal of Baltic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 187-210, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rbalxx:v:53:y:2022:i:2:p:187-210
    DOI: 10.1080/01629778.2021.1990094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01629778.2021.1990094
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01629778.2021.1990094?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rbalxx:v:53:y:2022:i:2:p:187-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rbal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.