IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rajsxx/v9y2017i1p21-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance evaluation of contractor development programmes in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Ambrose D. Dapaah
  • Wellington D. Thwala
  • Innocent Musonda

Abstract

The performance of the construction industry in South Africa is supported by its industry players, such as the construction contractors, and cannot be underestimated. The designed Contractor Development Programmes (CDPs) in South Africa are aimed at creating an enabling environment for the survival and sustainability of Small, Medium and Micro Enterprise (SMME) contractors. Despite the prime aim of the CDPs in facilitating sustainable growths among SMMEs, the CDPs, however, have not been adequately evaluated by their beneficiaries, according to existing literature. Therefore, the need for a study to investigate the impact of the CDPs on beneficiaries is prudent and formed the rational for this study. The aim of this study was to carry out performance evaluation from the perspective of the CDP beneficiaries. Questionnaire survey and structured interviews were adopted using construction SMMEs as the study population who were selected via the purposive sampling technique. This method was appropriate because it gave respondents the opportunity to express their views on the impact of the CDPs. The study found that beneficiaries were comparatively satisfied with the CDPs but requested that they should be given a face-lift to upgrade them and make them more sustainable. The study also established that there are gaps in the CDPs that the implementing agencies should cover to ensure the successful implementation of the CDPs. Further, the study concluded that continuous mentorship programmes for contractors is an apparent solution where performance of CDPs is inadequate, but that this vital component of training is lacking in most South African CDPs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ambrose D. Dapaah & Wellington D. Thwala & Innocent Musonda, 2017. "Performance evaluation of contractor development programmes in South Africa," African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 21-29, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rajsxx:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:21-29
    DOI: 10.1080/20421338.2016.1254847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20421338.2016.1254847
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20421338.2016.1254847?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rajsxx:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:21-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rajs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.