IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/raagxx/v112y2022i8p2373-2392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Centaur VGI: An Evaluation of Engagement, Speed, and Quality in Hybrid Humanitarian Mapping

Author

Listed:
  • Kirsty Watkinson
  • Jonathan J. Huck
  • Angela Harris

Abstract

Volunteered geographic information (VGI) is often cited as a potential solution to persistent global inequalities in map data, particularly in areas undergoing humanitarian crises. Poor volunteer engagement, slow data production, and low-quality outputs have limited progress, however, and can unintentionally exaggerate inequalities. Hybrid machine learning–VGI (ML–VGI) frameworks can help to overcome these challenges through a combination of workflow automation and purposive human input, but the use of these workflows is rare in practice. Here, we implement an ML–VGI framework (Centaur VGI) and undertake a detailed comparative usability assessment against an existing, widely used VGI mapping platform to demonstrate its potential to improve volunteer engagement, mapping speed, and data quality. Our results suggest that through automated building, searching, and labeling, the Centaur VGI platform provides greater usability, quicker data production, and improved data quality for most users. Consequently, we provide the first evidence that hybrid ML–VGI approaches can be used to facilitate increased public participation in humanitarian building mapping efforts and thus help reduce global inequalities in map data.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirsty Watkinson & Jonathan J. Huck & Angela Harris, 2022. "Centaur VGI: An Evaluation of Engagement, Speed, and Quality in Hybrid Humanitarian Mapping," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(8), pages 2373-2392, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:112:y:2022:i:8:p:2373-2392
    DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2022.2058907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24694452.2022.2058907
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24694452.2022.2058907?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:112:y:2022:i:8:p:2373-2392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raag .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.