IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/quantf/v17y2017i11p1683-1695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Backward simulation methods for pricing American options under the CIR process

Author

Listed:
  • Wenbin Hu
  • Junzi Zhou

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on backward simulation of the CIR process. The purpose is to solve the memory requirement issue of the Least Squares Monte Carlo method when pricing American options by simulation. The concept of backward simulation is presented and it is classified into two types. Under the framework of the second type backward simulation, we seek the solutions for the existing CIR schemes. Specifically, we propose forward–backward simulation approaches for Alfonsi’s two implicit schemes, the fixed Euler schemes and the exact scheme. The proposed schemes are numerically tested and compared in pricing American options under the Heston model and the stochastic interest rate model. Some numerical properties such as the convergence order of the explicit–implicit Euler schemes, the storage requirement estimation of the forward–backward exact scheme and its computing time comparison with the squared Bessel bridge are also tested. Finally, the pros and cons of the related backward simulation schemes are summarized.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenbin Hu & Junzi Zhou, 2017. "Backward simulation methods for pricing American options under the CIR process," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(11), pages 1683-1695, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:17:y:2017:i:11:p:1683-1695
    DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2017.1307513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14697688.2017.1307513
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14697688.2017.1307513?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 113-147.
    2. Devroye, Luc, 2002. "Simulating Bessel random variables," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 249-257, April.
    3. Nick Webber & Claudia Ribeiro, 2003. "Valuing Path Dependent Options in the Variance-Gamma Model by Monte Carlo with a Gamma Bridge," Computing in Economics and Finance 2003 4, Society for Computational Economics.
    4. John C. Cox & Jonathan E. Ingersoll Jr. & Stephen A. Ross, 2005. "A Theory Of The Term Structure Of Interest Rates," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Sudipto Bhattacharya & George M Constantinides (ed.), Theory Of Valuation, chapter 5, pages 129-164, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Roger Lord & Remmert Koekkoek & Dick Van Dijk, 2010. "A comparison of biased simulation schemes for stochastic volatility models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 177-194.
    6. Mark Broadie & Özgür Kaya, 2006. "Exact Simulation of Stochastic Volatility and Other Affine Jump Diffusion Processes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(2), pages 217-231, April.
    7. Heston, Steven L, 1993. "A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 6(2), pages 327-343.
    8. Nick Webber & Claudia Ribeiro, 2003. "A Monte Carlo Method for the Normal Inverse Gaussian Option Valuation Model using an Inverse Gaussian Bridge," Computing in Economics and Finance 2003 5, Society for Computational Economics.
    9. Bates, David S, 1996. "Jumps and Stochastic Volatility: Exchange Rate Processes Implicit in Deutsche Mark Options," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 9(1), pages 69-107.
    10. Roman N. Makarov & Devin Glew, 2009. "Exact Simulation of Bessel Diffusions," Papers 0910.4177, arXiv.org.
    11. Paul Glasserman & Kyoung-Kuk Kim, 2011. "Gamma expansion of the Heston stochastic volatility model," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 267-296, June.
    12. Jan Baldeaux & Dale Roberts, 2012. "Quasi-Monte Carlo methods for the Heston model," Papers 1202.3217, arXiv.org, revised May 2012.
    13. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt43n1k4jb, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
    14. Christian Kahl & Peter Jackel, 2006. "Fast strong approximation Monte Carlo schemes for stochastic volatility models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(6), pages 513-536.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. Gardini & P. Sabino & E. Sasso, 2021. "The Variance Gamma++ Process and Applications to Energy Markets," Papers 2106.15452, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Glasserman & Kyoung-Kuk Kim, 2011. "Gamma expansion of the Heston stochastic volatility model," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 267-296, June.
    2. Maya Briani & Lucia Caramellino & Giulia Terenzi & Antonino Zanette, 2019. "Numerical Stability Of A Hybrid Method For Pricing Options," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(07), pages 1-46, November.
    3. Michael A. Kouritzin, 2016. "Explicit Heston Solutions and Stochastic Approximation for Path-dependent Option Pricing," Papers 1608.02028, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2018.
    4. Michael A. Kouritzin, 2018. "Explicit Heston Solutions And Stochastic Approximation For Path-Dependent Option Pricing," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-45, February.
    5. Nicola Bruti-Liberati, 2007. "Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations with Jumps in Finance," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 1, July-Dece.
    6. Nicola Bruti-Liberati, 2007. "Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations with Jumps in Finance," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 1-2007.
    7. Bégin Jean-François & Bédard Mylène & Gaillardetz Patrice, 2015. "Simulating from the Heston model: A gamma approximation scheme," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 21(3), pages 205-231, September.
    8. Nan Chen & Zhengyu Huang, 2013. "Localization and Exact Simulation of Brownian Motion-Driven Stochastic Differential Equations," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 591-616, August.
    9. Mariano González-Sánchez & Eva M. Ibáñez Jiménez & Ana I. Segovia San Juan, 2022. "Market and model risks: a feasible joint estimate methodology," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(3), pages 187-213, September.
    10. Song-Ping Zhu & Xin-Jiang He, 2018. "A hybrid computational approach for option pricing," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    12. T. Pellegrino & P. Sabino, 2015. "Enhancing Least Squares Monte Carlo with diffusion bridges: an application to energy facilities," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 761-772, May.
    13. Roger Lord & Remmert Koekkoek & Dick Van Dijk, 2010. "A comparison of biased simulation schemes for stochastic volatility models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 177-194.
    14. Oleksandr Zhylyevskyy, 2010. "A fast Fourier transform technique for pricing American options under stochastic volatility," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, April.
    15. Corsaro, Stefania & Kyriakou, Ioannis & Marazzina, Daniele & Marino, Zelda, 2019. "A general framework for pricing Asian options under stochastic volatility on parallel architectures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 1082-1095.
    16. Beliaeva, Natalia & Nawalkha, Sanjay, 2012. "Pricing American interest rate options under the jump-extended constant-elasticity-of-variance short rate models," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 151-163.
    17. Maya Briani & Lucia Caramellino & Giulia Terenzi & Antonino Zanette, 2016. "Numerical stability of a hybrid method for pricing options," Papers 1603.07225, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2019.
    18. Jaehyuk Choi & Yue Kuen Kwok, 2023. "Simulation schemes for the Heston model with Poisson conditioning," Papers 2301.02800, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    19. Chung-Li Tseng & Daniel Wei-Chung Miao & San-Lin Chung & Pai-Ta Shih, 2021. "How Much Do Negative Probabilities Matter in Option Pricing?: A Case of a Lattice-Based Approach for Stochastic Volatility Models," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-32, May.
    20. Mascagni Michael & Hin Lin-Yee, 2013. "Parallel pseudo-random number generators: A derivative pricing perspective with the Heston stochastic volatility model," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 77-105, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:17:y:2017:i:11:p:1683-1695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RQUF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.