IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pocoec/v26y2014i1p89-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pension reform in the Czech Republic after 2010

Author

Listed:
  • Marek Loužek

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyse pension reform in the Czech Republic after 2010. Pension reform in the Czech Republic has gained new pace. The panel of consultants and experts on pension reform recommended mandatory saving in funds. The Constitutional Court ruled that citizens with higher incomes during their professional careers should receive higher pensions. The government responded by a minor amendment to the Pension Insurance Act and also prepared a major pension reform, which has introduced an opt-out, albeit on a fairly modest scale. The political risks of the current pension reform are considerable. The Czech government is introducing an opt-out in times when the neighbouring countries are slowly abandoning this approach. People are quite sensitive to the problems which are associated with the reform in Central Europe. They have the feeling that government is forcing on them something that does not work elsewhere. A genuine reform should be fiscally neutral, i.e. it should not generate any new fiscal deficits -- whether explicit or implicit. Therefore it should be gradually modifying the parameters of the PAYG system. At present, increasing the age of retirement and decreasing the average pension/wage ratio seem to be options.

Suggested Citation

  • Marek Loužek, 2014. "Pension reform in the Czech Republic after 2010," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 89-102, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pocoec:v:26:y:2014:i:1:p:89-102
    DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2014.874657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14631377.2014.874657
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14631377.2014.874657?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pocoec:v:26:y:2014:i:1:p:89-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CPCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.