IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oaefxx/v8y2020i1p1720056.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Algorithmic setups for trading popular U.S. ETFs

Author

Listed:
  • Gil Cohen
  • David McMillan

Abstract

In this research, we test whether common trading oscillators can outperform the buy-and-hold strategy (B&H) using six popular ETFs for the period of the last 20 years. We use the original setups of those oscillators and also other setups or oscillators combinations in order to achieve the best past performances. We found that the Relative Strength Index (RSI) combined with Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) gained positive returns for all examined ETFs and also outperformed by 79% the corresponding buy-and-hold strategy for the XLF. The Commodity Channel Index (CCI) and Bollinger Bands (BB) were found to be the best technical tools for trading the examined ETFs. While the CCI performs better for the more volatile ETFs (XLF and XLK), the BB was superior for trading IWM and XLI which are less volatile. We also recommend the CCI strategy for trading the SPY. No technical tools were found to be more effective than B&H strategy for the QQQ.

Suggested Citation

  • Gil Cohen & David McMillan, 2020. "Algorithmic setups for trading popular U.S. ETFs," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1720056-172, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:1720056
    DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2020.1720056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2020.1720056
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23322039.2020.1720056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:1720056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.