IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v9y2022i1p2112527.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fintech credit, credit information sharing and bank stability: some international evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Thanh Liem
  • Tran Hung Son
  • Ho Huu Tin
  • Nguyen Thi Canh

Abstract

This study relies on an aggregate dataset of 73 countries from 2013 to 2018 to investigate the nexus between fintech credit, credit information sharing on bank stability. We document several significant findings. First, our evidence implies that fintech credit tends to improve bank stability. This suggests that as fintech credit grows, it certainly competes with banks, but it also strengthens banks’ stability. Second, credit information sharing increases bank stability. Thirdly, it is found that the impact of fintech credit on bank stability may depend on credit information sharing. Specifically, the presence of credit information sharing institutions may facilitate the positive effect of fintech credit on bank stability. This result remains unchanged to the introduction of alternative regression, as well as an alternative dependent variable. Finally, policy implications are discussed based on the findings of the research.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Thanh Liem & Tran Hung Son & Ho Huu Tin & Nguyen Thi Canh, 2022. "Fintech credit, credit information sharing and bank stability: some international evidence," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2112527-211, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:9:y:2022:i:1:p:2112527
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2112527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2022.2112527
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2022.2112527?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:9:y:2022:i:1:p:2112527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.