IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v10y2023i3p2278233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Job seekers satisfy or dissatisfy with the existing electronic recruitment: A theoretical and empirical investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Siaw Kissi

Abstract

This study aims to fill the gap by identifying factors and their effects on job seekers’ satisfaction with existing e-recruitment systems. A longitudinal cohort research design was employed for the study. Semi-structured interviews and a survey questionnaire were used as research instruments. Two hundred sixty-five job seekers (265) and seven human resource staff were purposively sampled for the study. The human resource staff answered the interview questions while the job seekers responded to the survey questionnaire. The finding indicates that factors affecting job seekers’ satisfaction with the e-recruitment systems are expectation, performance, perceived e-recruitment fraud, and e-recruitment brand quality. More so, the finding reveals that expectation, perceived performance, and confirmation are positively associated with the satisfaction of e-recruitment systems. On the contrary, perceived e-recruitment fraud is negatively associated with confirmation and consequently affects job seekers’ e-recruitment satisfaction. Surprisingly, another finding shows that jobseekers are dissatisfied with the existing e-recruitment because their expectations and perceived e-recruitment fraud are higher than the perceived performance of the existing e-recruitment systems. These findings have several implications for policy and recommendations for various levels of stakeholders focusing on e-recruitment systems. Detailed results of theoretical contribution and policy implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Siaw Kissi, 2023. "Job seekers satisfy or dissatisfy with the existing electronic recruitment: A theoretical and empirical investigation," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 2278233-227, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:10:y:2023:i:3:p:2278233
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2278233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2023.2278233
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2023.2278233?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:10:y:2023:i:3:p:2278233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.