IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/mimoxx/v50y2020i3p271-290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ethical challenge of Big Tech’s “disruptive philanthropy”

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Manning
  • Nigel Baker
  • Peter Stokes

Abstract

This article provides a review of research into global philanthropy and the disruptive practices of new technology companies. In this article we detail how “Big Tech” has created a new marketization of philanthropy, based on its sectoral values of innovation, entrepreneurialism and focus on financial and performance metrics. Consequently, we argue for a new ontology of philanthropy that acknowledges marketization as its guiding principle. The study examines and compares different market-focused, philanthropic paradigms, which have evolved through the business values of Big Tech and examines their moral motivations. The topic is viewed through the lens of ‘hybrid organizations’; a model for nonprofit entities and social businesses which, in turn, are seeking a market-oriented pathway of balancing the twin demands of managing mission and money. A conceptual framework is then provided to inform practitioners in nonprofit organizations about the issues and risks of engaging with the new types of philanthropy, to which we collectively refer as ‘disruptive philanthropy’. The article concludes by recommending further research into the ethics of Big Tech to understand the true motivations behind its philanthropic practices at a time when the sector is under intense governmental and media scrutiny.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Manning & Nigel Baker & Peter Stokes, 2020. "The ethical challenge of Big Tech’s “disruptive philanthropy”," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 271-290, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:mimoxx:v:50:y:2020:i:3:p:271-290
    DOI: 10.1080/00208825.2020.1811522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00208825.2020.1811522
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00208825.2020.1811522?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:mimoxx:v:50:y:2020:i:3:p:271-290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/mimo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.