IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v41y2014i4p405-424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational change for port authorities: a social information processing analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng-sheng Lai
  • Rong-her Chiu
  • Chih-ching Chang
  • Kung-don Ye

Abstract

Port authorities, like other organizations, have been constantly required to evolve in response to business, environmental, and technical changes since the 1980s to continue improving their competitiveness and performance. However, people often resist change due to various reasons, and the uncertainty of change has been pointed out as one of the most important reasons why this happens. This study contributes to social information processing (SIP) research and constructs an SIP model to explore employee's response to port organizational reform in Taiwan. Empirical results are consistent with general job schema, where employees with job security orientation are less supportive of port corporatization, and those with corporate development orientation are more supportive of port organizational reform. Organizational trust and job conception are related to port workers' attitude to port corporatization. Nevertheless, organizational communication does not positively moderate the relationship between job schema and employee attitude to port organizational change.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng-sheng Lai & Rong-her Chiu & Chih-ching Chang & Kung-don Ye, 2014. "Organizational change for port authorities: a social information processing analysis," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 405-424, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:41:y:2014:i:4:p:405-424
    DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2013.779039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839.2013.779039
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088839.2013.779039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:41:y:2014:i:4:p:405-424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.