IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v53y2024i9p3259-3275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pairwise comparisons using ranks in block designs

Author

Listed:
  • Dennis Boos
  • Kaiyuan Duan

Abstract

Friedman’s rank test and the associated aligned rank test are the standard rank alternatives to the classical linear models F statistic for the randomized complete block design (RCBD). However, in current practice there are no good rank alternatives to the Tukey–Kramer all pairwise comparisons procedure for the normal linear model. For example, the standard rank method found in Section 7.3 of Hollander et al. [John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey; 2014] is based on the permutation distribution under the complete null of no differences and thus cannot strongly control the family-wise error rate (FWER). It also has low power. However, we show that the closed method introduced by Marcus et al. [Biometrika 63 (3);1976:655–60] applied to aligned ranks has strong FWER control and good power compared to the Tukey–Kramer method for long-tailed error distributions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dennis Boos & Kaiyuan Duan, 2024. "Pairwise comparisons using ranks in block designs," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(9), pages 3259-3275, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:53:y:2024:i:9:p:3259-3275
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2022.2151310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2022.2151310
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2022.2151310?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:53:y:2024:i:9:p:3259-3275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.