IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v53y2024i5p1716-1735.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing components of two-way interaction in multi-environment trials

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Forkman
  • Waqas Ahmed Malik
  • Steffen Hadasch
  • Hans-Peter Piepho

Abstract

Experiments with two factors are commonly analyzed using two-way analysis of variance, where testing significance of interaction is straightforward. However, using bilinear models, interaction can be analyzed further. The additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model uses singular value decomposition for partitioning interaction into multiplicative terms, such that the first terms typically account for a large portion of the sum of squares, whereas the last terms are of minor importance. This model is used extensively for analysis of genotype-by-environment interaction in multi-environment trials. A recurring question is how to determine the number of terms to retain in the model. If data is replicated, which is usually the case, the FR test can be used for this purpose. The simple parametric bootstrap method is another option, although this test was developed for unreplicated data. Since both of these tests of significance may be applied in cases with replication, researchers need advice on which of the methods to use. We discuss several statistical models and show that the two methods address different questions.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Forkman & Waqas Ahmed Malik & Steffen Hadasch & Hans-Peter Piepho, 2024. "Testing components of two-way interaction in multi-environment trials," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(5), pages 1716-1735, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:53:y:2024:i:5:p:1716-1735
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2022.2108058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2022.2108058
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2022.2108058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:53:y:2024:i:5:p:1716-1735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.