IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v53y2024i2p627-640.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subsample scan test for multiple breaks based on self-normalization

Author

Listed:
  • Ji-Eun Choi
  • Dong Wan Shin

Abstract

The self-normalization of Shao and Zhang and subsample scan method of Yau and Zhao are combined to produce a test SN for testing breaks for time series data. Unlike the original break test based on self-normalization of Shao and Zhang, the proposed test has power against canceling multiple breaks. The proposed test has several advantages over an existing test TN of Zhang and Lavitas designed for the same purpose of detecting canceling multiple breaks: having no computational burden issue; having stabler size; having no need for specification of a trimming parameter. Comparison is also made with the recent test UN by Schmidt for mean break and by Schmidt et al. for variance break based on U-statistics and shows better size of SN than UN for serially correlated samples but worse power of SN than UN. Unlike UN, SN is a general purpose test which can be used for testing break in any parameter, for example, correlation, under some weak conditions. These advantages recommend us the proposed test SN as a practical alternative to TN and UN in spite of some disadvantages of smaller power and requiring specification of a parameter for the number of windows.

Suggested Citation

  • Ji-Eun Choi & Dong Wan Shin, 2024. "Subsample scan test for multiple breaks based on self-normalization," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 627-640, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:53:y:2024:i:2:p:627-640
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2022.2087883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2022.2087883
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2022.2087883?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:53:y:2024:i:2:p:627-640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.