IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v53y2024i10p3547-3567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of complier causal treatment effects under the additive hazards model with interval-censored data

Author

Listed:
  • Yuqing Ma
  • Peijie Wang
  • Shuwei Li
  • Jianguo Sun

Abstract

Estimation of causal treatment effects has attracted a great deal of interest in many areas including social, biological and health science, and for this, instrumental variable (IV) has become a commonly used tool in the presence of unmeasured confounding. In particular, many IV methods have been developed for right-censored time-to-event outcomes. In this paper, we consider a much more complicated situation where one faces interval-censored time-to-event outcomes, which are ubiquitously present in studies with, for example, intermittent follow-up but are challenging to handle in terms of both theory and computation. A sieve maximum likelihood estimation procedure is proposed for estimating complier causal treatment effects under the additive hazards model, and the resulting estimators are shown to be consistent and asymptotically normal. A simulation study is conducted to evaluate the finite sample performance of the proposed approach and suggests that it works well in practice. It is applied to a breast cancer screening study.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuqing Ma & Peijie Wang & Shuwei Li & Jianguo Sun, 2024. "Estimation of complier causal treatment effects under the additive hazards model with interval-censored data," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(10), pages 3547-3567, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:53:y:2024:i:10:p:3547-3567
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2022.2155791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2022.2155791
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2022.2155791?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:53:y:2024:i:10:p:3547-3567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.