IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v50y2021i7p1532-1546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of the system reliability for generalized inverse Lindley distribution based on different sampling designs

Author

Listed:
  • Fatma Gul Akgul
  • Keming Yu
  • Birdal Senoglu

Abstract

In this paper, we are interested in estimating stress-strength reliability when the distributions of stress and strength are independent generalized inverse Lindley (GIL) under different sampling designs, namely, simple random sampling (SRS), ranked set sampling (RSS) and percentile ranked set sampling (PRSS). In the context of parameter estimation, we use maximum likelihood (ML) methodology. The performance of the ML estimators of stress-strength reliability based on SRS, RSS and PRSS are compared via a Monte-Carlo simulation study for different parameter settings and sample sizes under the assumptions of perfect and imperfect ranking, respectively. At the end of the study, the insulin resistance data set is analyzed to implement the proposed methodologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatma Gul Akgul & Keming Yu & Birdal Senoglu, 2021. "Estimation of the system reliability for generalized inverse Lindley distribution based on different sampling designs," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(7), pages 1532-1546, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:50:y:2021:i:7:p:1532-1546
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2019.1705977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2019.1705977
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2019.1705977?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:50:y:2021:i:7:p:1532-1546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.