IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v46y2017i1p189-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison between count of cumulative conforming sampling plans and Dodge–Romig single sampling plan

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Ahmadi Yazdi
  • Mohammad Saber Fallahnezhad

Abstract

In this research, a new sampling system is introduced based on the concept of count of cumulative conforming control charts (CCC-charts). The proposed method is based on Markov modeling and negative binomial distribution. The proposed sampling system is compared with traditional sampling methods like Dodge–Romig single sampling plan based on lot tolerance percent defective (LTPD) and Dodge–Romig single sampling plan based on average outgoing quality limit (AOQL) and its superiority for larger values of lot sizes and process average is denoted using a comparison study.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Ahmadi Yazdi & Mohammad Saber Fallahnezhad, 2017. "Comparison between count of cumulative conforming sampling plans and Dodge–Romig single sampling plan," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 189-199, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:46:y:2017:i:1:p:189-199
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2014.988263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2014.988263
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2014.988263?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:46:y:2017:i:1:p:189-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.