IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v45y2016i6p1747-1777.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing homogeneity of the multinomial proportions

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Chen
  • Joseph Glaz
  • Cristina P. Sison

Abstract

In this article, we investigate some statistical procedures for testing homogeneity in a multinomial population. First we focus on the simpler problem of testing homogeneity in the entire vector of multinomial proportions. When the null hypothesis of uniformity is violated, some of the cell frequencies will tend to be small and some will tend to be large. We propose to investigate the performance of tests based on X(k) = max {X1, ...., Xk} or X(1) = min {X1, ...., Xk}, which are functions of the minimal sufficient statistics for this problem. The performance of the likelihood ratio test implemented by the asymptotic chi-square distribution and the simulated exact distribution will be compared to a test which is based on the maximum, the minimum, the pair maximum and minimum, the range, and the ratio statistic: X(k)/X(1). We also investigate the more difficult problem of testing homogeneity of a subset of the p-vector. For this problem, we focus only on likelihood ratio tests and investigate two implementations. Simulation studies are presented to evaluate the accuracy of achieving the targeted significance level and to compare the powers of the test statistics mentioned above for a range of alternatives. Based on the numerical results, recommendations are given for employing these testing procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Chen & Joseph Glaz & Cristina P. Sison, 2016. "Testing homogeneity of the multinomial proportions," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 1747-1777, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:45:y:2016:i:6:p:1747-1777
    DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2014.966839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2014.966839
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610926.2014.966839?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:45:y:2016:i:6:p:1747-1777. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.