IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lstaxx/v29y2000i7p1487-1509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation for u-shaped beta distributions: minimum hellinger distance and related methods

Author

Listed:
  • D. Richard Cutler
  • Adele Cutler

Abstract

We compare minimum Hellinger distance and minimum Heiiinger disparity estimates for U-shaped beta distributions. Given suitable density estimates, both methods are known to be asymptotically efficient when the data come from the assumed model family, and robust to small perturbations from the model family. Most implementations use kernel density estimates, which may not be appropriate for U-shaped distributions. We compare fixed binwidth histograms, percentile mesh histograms, and averaged shifted histograms. Minimum disparity estimates are less sensitive to the choice of density estimate than are minimum distance estimates, and the percentile mesh histogram gives the best results for both minimum distance and minimum disparity estimates. Minimum distance estimates are biased and a bias-corrected method is proposed. Minimum disparity estimates and bias-corrected minimum distance estimates are comparable to maximum likelihood estimates when the model holds, and give better results than either method of moments or maximum likelihood when the data are discretized or contaminated, Although our re¬sults are for the beta density, the implementations are easily modified for other U-shaped distributions such as the Dirkhlet or normal generated distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Richard Cutler & Adele Cutler, 2000. "Estimation for u-shaped beta distributions: minimum hellinger distance and related methods," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(7), pages 1487-1509, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:29:y:2000:i:7:p:1487-1509
    DOI: 10.1080/03610920008832558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610920008832558
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03610920008832558?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:29:y:2000:i:7:p:1487-1509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lsta .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.