IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v45y2022i6p499-510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public–private Partnerships for Urban Projects: A Korean Case of Partnership Failure

Author

Listed:
  • Yoon-jung Kim

Abstract

In past literature, key attention has been paid to public-private cooperation as a condition for partnership success. However, there have been few studies on the circumstances in which public and private actors choose not to cooperate. Drawing upon the theories related to contract-based and relational cooperation, this study examines when and why public and private actors opt not to cooperate while taking account of local contexts that undermine cooperation. The study conducts a case analysis of the Yongsan project in Korea that had ended up in termination. It suggests that although the actors would have negotiated a deal that maximizes their benefits within options available, they might choose not to cooperate when they have lost assurance of achieving self-interests and have little practical control over the project. The study emphasizes the need to pay greater attention to local contexts which shape the business deal and public–private relationships for cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoon-jung Kim, 2022. "Public–private Partnerships for Urban Projects: A Korean Case of Partnership Failure," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 499-510, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:45:y:2022:i:6:p:499-510
    DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2020.1867574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2020.1867574
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01900692.2020.1867574?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:45:y:2022:i:6:p:499-510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.