IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v45y2022i5p442-452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning Paradox and Employee Performance: Empirical Evidence in a Vietnamese Public University

Author

Listed:
  • Thi Nguyet Que Nguyen
  • Quan Ha Minh Tran

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to extend existing theory of organizational learning and develop a theoretical model that explores the role of exploratory learning, exploitative learning, and organizational learning capability (OLC) on individual employee performance in the higher education environment. The results of PLS-SEM analysis of data collected from 181 academics of a top public university in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam demonstrate that exploratory and exploitative learning are the key drivers of employee performance. Moreover, the findings shed light on the conditions that facilitate the contribution of exploratory and exploitative learning on employee performance. While balancing exploratory learning and exploitative learning in ambidextrous organizations creates synergy and fosters employee performance, the realization of this synergy requires the presence of OLC. The study also provides practical implications to assist higher education providers in public sector in understanding how learning mechanisms and OLC can work together towards enhancing academics’ performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Thi Nguyet Que Nguyen & Quan Ha Minh Tran, 2022. "Learning Paradox and Employee Performance: Empirical Evidence in a Vietnamese Public University," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 442-452, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:45:y:2022:i:5:p:442-452
    DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2021.2010751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2021.2010751
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01900692.2021.2010751?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:45:y:2022:i:5:p:442-452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.