IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v45y2022i10p794-806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privatization of Public Services: A Systematic Review of Quality Differences between Public and Private Daycare Providers

Author

Listed:
  • Lena Brogaard
  • Ole Helby Petersen

Abstract

While the past decades have witnessed a growing proportion of publicly funded services delivered by private providers, analyses of the consequences for service quality are scarce. Economic theories promote privatization in markets that are competitive and when service quality is relatively easy to define and monitor, however, quasi-markets for public services seldom fulfill these assumptions. This article extends previous research by presenting the findings of an international systematic review of cross-sectoral studies on quality differences between public, non-profit and for-profit providers of daycare services. We find no indication in the literature of higher quality with private providers; if anything, the evaluative evidence suggests that public providers tend to offer slightly higher service quality. We discuss how these insights contribute to theoretical and empirical debates about public and private delivery of services and consider lessons for practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Lena Brogaard & Ole Helby Petersen, 2022. "Privatization of Public Services: A Systematic Review of Quality Differences between Public and Private Daycare Providers," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(10), pages 794-806, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:45:y:2022:i:10:p:794-806
    DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2021.1909619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2021.1909619
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01900692.2021.1909619?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:45:y:2022:i:10:p:794-806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.