IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/lpadxx/v44y2021i8p636-647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Closer Look at What Goes Wrong: Public Employee Cynicism and Resistance to Administrative Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Eunju Rho
  • Juyong Jung
  • Taewoo Nam

Abstract

Despite numerous administrative reform efforts, few truly new and innovative changes are initiated, and repeated reform efforts can jeopardize the success of any new ones. Public employees become cynical and frustrated when faced with the constant parade of initiatives that come with the usual promise of imminent improvement but fail to materialize. Employees’ cynicism about administrative reform can inhibit their willingness to initiate future innovative action and plans. This study aims to contribute to a better understanding of organizational change cynicism by exploring how individual, relational, and organizational factors influence employees’ cynicism and how cynicism forms a resistance to participating in reform efforts, using data from a survey of 1,161 local government employees in South Korea. Negative affectivity, organizational identification, colleague cynicism, trust in management, perceived resource availability, and participative working environment served as antecedents of cynicism that can lead to resistance to administrative reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Eunju Rho & Juyong Jung & Taewoo Nam, 2021. "A Closer Look at What Goes Wrong: Public Employee Cynicism and Resistance to Administrative Reform," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 636-647, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:44:y:2021:i:8:p:636-647
    DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2020.1742738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2020.1742738
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01900692.2020.1742738?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:44:y:2021:i:8:p:636-647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/lpad .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.