IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlbes/v40y2022i4p1745-1758.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tests of Equal Forecasting Accuracy for Nested Models with Estimated CCE Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Ovidijus Stauskas
  • Joakim Westerlund

Abstract

In this article, we propose new tests of equal predictive ability between nested models when factor-augmented regressions are used to forecast. In contrast to the previous literature, the unknown factors are not estimated by principal components but by the common correlated effects (CCE) approach, which employs cross-sectional averages of blocks of variables. This makes for easy interpretation of the estimated factors, and the resulting tests are easy to implement and they account for the block structure of the data. Assuming that the number of averages is larger than the true number of factors, we establish the limiting distributions of the new tests as the number of time periods and the number of variables within each block jointly go to infinity. The main finding is that the limiting distributions do not depend on the number of factors but only on the number of averages, which is known. The important practical implication of this finding is that one does not need to estimate the number of factors consistently in order to apply our tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Ovidijus Stauskas & Joakim Westerlund, 2022. "Tests of Equal Forecasting Accuracy for Nested Models with Estimated CCE Factors," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 1745-1758, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlbes:v:40:y:2022:i:4:p:1745-1758
    DOI: 10.1080/07350015.2021.1970576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07350015.2021.1970576
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07350015.2021.1970576?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlbes:v:40:y:2022:i:4:p:1745-1758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UBES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.