IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v111y2016i515p1289-1300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Joint Inference for Competing Risks Survival Data

Author

Listed:
  • Gang Li
  • Qing Yang

Abstract

This article develops joint inferential methods for the cause-specific hazard function and the cumulative incidence function of a specific type of failure to assess the effects of a variable on the time to the type of failure of interest in the presence of competing risks. Joint inference for the two functions are needed in practice because (i) they describe different characteristics of a given type of failure, (ii) they do not uniquely determine each other, and (iii) the effects of a variable on the two functions can be different and one often does not know which effects are to be expected. We study both the group comparison problem and the regression problem. We also discuss joint inference for other related functions. Our simulation shows that our joint tests can be considerably more powerful than the Bonferroni method, which has important practical implications to the analysis and design of clinical studies with competing risks data. We illustrate our method using a Hodgkin disease data and a lymphoma data. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Suggested Citation

  • Gang Li & Qing Yang, 2016. "Joint Inference for Competing Risks Survival Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(515), pages 1289-1300, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:111:y:2016:i:515:p:1289-1300
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1093942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2015.1093942
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2015.1093942?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Håkan Lindkvist & Yuri Belyaev, 1998. "A Class of Non‐parametric Tests in the Competing Risks Model for Comparing Two Samples," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 25(1), pages 143-150, March.
    2. Bajorunaite, Ruta & Klein, John P., 2007. "Two-sample tests of the equality of two cumulative incidence functions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4269-4281, May.
    3. S. W. Lagakos, 1978. "A Covariate Model for Partially Censored Data Subject to Competing Causes of Failure," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 27(3), pages 235-241, November.
    4. J. P. Fine, 1999. "Analysing competing risks data with transformation models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(4), pages 817-830.
    5. John P. Klein & Per Kragh Andersen, 2005. "Regression Modeling of Competing Risks Data Based on Pseudovalues of the Cumulative Incidence Function," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 223-229, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ambrogi, Federico & Biganzoli, Elia & Boracchi, Patrizia, 2009. "Estimating crude cumulative incidences through multinomial logit regression on discrete cause-specific hazards," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 2767-2779, May.
    2. Frank Eriksson & Jianing Li & Thomas Scheike & Mei‐Jie Zhang, 2015. "The proportional odds cumulative incidence model for competing risks," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 687-695, September.
    3. D. Dobler & J. Beyersmann & M. Pauly, 2017. "Non-strange weird resampling for complex survival data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 104(3), pages 699-711.
    4. Annalisa Orenti & Patrizia Boracchi & Giuseppe Marano & Elia Biganzoli & Federico Ambrogi, 2022. "A pseudo-values regression model for non-fatal event free survival in the presence of semi-competing risks," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(3), pages 709-727, September.
    5. Malay Naskar & Kalyan Das & Joseph G. Ibrahim, 2005. "A Semiparametric Mixture Model for Analyzing Clustered Competing Risks Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 729-737, September.
    6. Mats J. Stensrud & Jessica G. Young & Torben Martinussen, 2021. "Discussion on “Causal mediation of semicompeting risks” by Yen‐Tsung Huang," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1160-1164, December.
    7. Michael J. Martens & Brent R. Logan, 2018. "A group sequential test for treatment effect based on the Fine–Gray model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 1006-1013, September.
    8. Yosra Yousif & Faiz Elfaki & Meftah Hrairi & Oyelola Adegboye, 2022. "Bayesian Analysis of Masked Competing Risks Data Based on Proportional Subdistribution Hazards Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-10, August.
    9. Erik T. Parner & Per K. Andersen & Morten Overgaard, 2020. "Cumulative risk regression in case–cohort studies using pseudo-observations," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 639-658, October.
    10. Su, Pei-Fang & Chi, Yunchan & Li, Chung-I & Shyr, Yu & Liao, Yi-De, 2011. "Analyzing survival curves at a fixed point in time for paired and clustered right-censored data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 1617-1628, April.
    11. Frank Eriksson & Thomas Scheike, 2015. "Additive gamma frailty models with applications to competing risks in related individuals," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 677-686, September.
    12. Wang, Hong & Zhang, Xu, 2016. "Confidence Band for the Differences between Two Direct Adjusted Survival Curves," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 70(c02).
    13. Zijing Yang & Chengfeng Zhang & Yawen Hou & Zheng Chen, 2023. "Analysis of dynamic restricted mean survival time based on pseudo‐observations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3690-3700, December.
    14. Deresa, Negera Wakgari & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2020. "A multivariate normal regression model for survival data subject to different types of dependent censoring," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    15. Sangbum Choi & Xuelin Huang, 2014. "Maximum likelihood estimation of semiparametric mixture component models for competing risks data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 588-598, September.
    16. Tomi Kyyrä, 2009. "Marginal Effects for Competing Risks Models with Piecewise Constant Hazards," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 71(4), pages 539-565, August.
    17. Jianbo Li & Minggao Gu & Tao Hu, 2012. "General partially linear varying-coefficient transformation models for ranking data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 1475-1488, January.
    18. Hu, Tao & Xiang, Liming, 2016. "Partially linear transformation cure models for interval-censored data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 257-269.
    19. Michael J. Martens & Brent R. Logan, 2020. "Group sequential tests for treatment effect on survival and cumulative incidence at a fixed time point," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 603-623, July.
    20. M. A. Nicolaie & J. C. van Houwelingen & T. M. de Witte & H. Putter, 2013. "Dynamic Pseudo-Observations: A Robust Approach to Dynamic Prediction in Competing Risks," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 1043-1052, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:111:y:2016:i:515:p:1289-1300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.