IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jmedec/v25y2012i4p184-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Magazine “Companion Websites” and the Demand for Newsstand Sales and Subscriptions

Author

Listed:
  • Ulrich Kaiser
  • Hans Christian Kongsted

Abstract

The authors analyzed the relationship of visits to a magazine's online companion website and total circulation, subscription, and kiosk sales using bivariate vector autoregressions estimated on 67 German magazines that were observed monthly in the period May 1998 to November 2009. Their econometric analysis finds some support for the widespread belief that the Internet cannibalizes print media. On average, a 1% increase in companion website traffic is associated with a weakly significant decrease in total print circulation by 0.15%. This association is mainly driven by a statistically significant and negative mapping between website visits and kiosk sales, although they do not find any statistically significant relationship between website visits and subscriptions. The latter finding is reassuring for publishers because advertisers value a large subscriber base. Moreover, the authors show that the negative relationships between website visits and total circulation as well as kiosk sales are primarily associated with magazines that have a mainly male and Internet--affine readership and by magazines that are published with a less than weekly periodicity.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulrich Kaiser & Hans Christian Kongsted, 2012. "Magazine “Companion Websites” and the Demand for Newsstand Sales and Subscriptions," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 184-197, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jmedec:v:25:y:2012:i:4:p:184-197
    DOI: 10.1080/08997764.2012.729545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08997764.2012.729545
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08997764.2012.729545?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nodir Adilov & Hugh J. Martin, 2013. "Editors' Note on Future Directions for the Journal of Media Economics," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 115-119, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jmedec:v:25:y:2012:i:4:p:184-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/HMEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.