IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v67y2024i5p1053-1076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increasing uptake of improved land management practice to benefit environment and landholders: insights through a transaction cost lens

Author

Listed:
  • Anthea Coggan
  • Rachel Hay
  • Diane Jarvis
  • Rachel Eberhard
  • Barbara Colls

Abstract

Transaction costs, related to either investigating improved land management practices (ILMP), engaging in adoption support programs for these practices and/or implementing changes on-ground, create barriers to ILMP adoption. Perceived and actual transaction costs have long been hypothesised as a potential barrier to grazier adoption of ILMPs in catchments to the Great Barrier Reef. Applying a framework derived from transaction cost theory, we assess this hypothesis. Through semi-structured interviews of a sample of participants in two ILMP programs, we find that ILMP adoption support program characteristics have a large influence on perceived and actual transaction costs of landholders seeking to engage in ILMP programs or adopt ILMPs. The importance of establishing and nurturing relationships between landholders and extension officers was also highlighted as critical to reducing landholder transaction costs. The degree to which relationships reduce transaction costs demonstrates the importance of fostering landholder leadership in ILMP program design as well as targeted extension in supporting adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthea Coggan & Rachel Hay & Diane Jarvis & Rachel Eberhard & Barbara Colls, 2024. "Increasing uptake of improved land management practice to benefit environment and landholders: insights through a transaction cost lens," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(5), pages 1053-1076, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:67:y:2024:i:5:p:1053-1076
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2022.2146310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2022.2146310
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2022.2146310?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:67:y:2024:i:5:p:1053-1076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.