IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v67y2024i4p788-808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Zoning to enhance local sustainability: why local governments choose to use sustainability-focused land use tools

Author

Listed:
  • Sung-Wook Kwon
  • Daniel Benjamin Bailey
  • Cheong Kim

Abstract

The use of land use regulations to enhance a city’s sustainability portfolio is not well understood by public administration and policy scholars. Given the positive impact higher-density, environmentally conscious zoning instruments can have on a city’s overall progress toward increased sustainability, we seek to determine why some cities use these sustainability-focused land use regulations and others do not. After developing an explanatory framework emphasizing a city’s population growth and environmental stress, as well as its political institutions and economic conditions, we use an enhanced ICMA’s (International City/County Management Association) Local Government Sustainability Practices survey to test our predictions. We find that cities experiencing greater population growth and environmental stress will be more likely to include land use regulations in their sustainability portfolios. We also find that cities operating under council-manager forms of government and those with greater fiscal resources are more likely to have sustainability-focused zoning regulations in place.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung-Wook Kwon & Daniel Benjamin Bailey & Cheong Kim, 2024. "Zoning to enhance local sustainability: why local governments choose to use sustainability-focused land use tools," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(4), pages 788-808, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:67:y:2024:i:4:p:788-808
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2022.2133685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2022.2133685
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2022.2133685?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:67:y:2024:i:4:p:788-808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.