IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v66y2023i7p1393-1412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A conceptual framework and research method for understanding protected area governance: varying approaches and epistemic worldviews about human-nature relations

Author

Listed:
  • Jingyu Li
  • Arie Stoffelen
  • Frank Vanclay

Abstract

Research about the relations between protected areas and local communities ranges from nature-centred to human-centred approaches. Differing epistemic worldviews and fragmentation characterize this literature. We analyzed the rationale underpinning approaches to protected area governance. We classified them according to their perspective on human-nature relations. Using the components of stakeholder mapping, and adding the concepts of human-nature interaction, landscape values, and land-use preferences, we designed a conceptual framework and research method to improve understanding of the governance of specific protected areas. The method comprises 6 steps: (1) identify all stakeholders; (2) identify those stakeholders in power positions and determine their view of nature; (3) establish the landscape values and preferences of other stakeholder groups; (4) study the institutional context and power relations; (5) consider the agency and capacity of each group and their engagement with the protected area; and (6) determine what recommendations might be made to improve protected area governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingyu Li & Arie Stoffelen & Frank Vanclay, 2023. "A conceptual framework and research method for understanding protected area governance: varying approaches and epistemic worldviews about human-nature relations," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(7), pages 1393-1412, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:66:y:2023:i:7:p:1393-1412
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2022.2034605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2022.2034605
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2022.2034605?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:66:y:2023:i:7:p:1393-1412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.