IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v66y2023i14p2832-2853.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why the Central government prefers to centralize spatial planning approval authority in China? An explanation based on land risk

Author

Listed:
  • Tianxiao Zhou
  • Rumei Hu

Abstract

There are various explanations for the centralization of planning approval authority, but few studies focus on the explanation of selective centralization from a national governance perspective. To address this gap, this paper uses the concept of land risk to identify the reason why central government centralizes the planning approval authority of a prefectural-city in China. An econometric quantitative approach is adopted. The findings suggest that land risk from farmland protection is an important factor affecting centralization. Specifically, the probability of centralization increases by approximately 2% for each unit reduction in per capita farmland area, by 1.6% for every 1% increase in land transfer area and by 1% for each level increase in illegal land use. Furthermore, the cities with high land risk are mainly concentrated in four provinces along eastern coastal China. Additionally, the result is predicted with an overall accuracy of 93%, which proves the validity of the model.

Suggested Citation

  • Tianxiao Zhou & Rumei Hu, 2023. "Why the Central government prefers to centralize spatial planning approval authority in China? An explanation based on land risk," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(14), pages 2832-2853, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:66:y:2023:i:14:p:2832-2853
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2022.2086856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2022.2086856
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2022.2086856?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:66:y:2023:i:14:p:2832-2853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.