IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v64y2021i8p1352-1374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eliciting actors’ perspectives in integrated watershed management: exploring a practical tool based on a mental model approach

Author

Listed:
  • Raphael Gaus
  • Adrienne Grêt-Regamey
  • Matthias Buchecker

Abstract

A profound understanding of actors’ perspectives on issues to be resolved is essential for researchers and practitioners in integrated natural resource management. Existing mental model approaches to systematically elicit such perspectives have been based on qualitative interviews, which implies small sample sizes or time-consuming analyses. Few studies have investigated complex projects of practical relevance. We studied the actors’ perspectives before the participatory process in a real-world integrated watershed management project through qualitative interviews and a quantitative survey based on a theoretical framework inspired by mental model approaches. We identified clear accordance and discordance among the perspectives regarding meanings of the water bodies, objectives for their management, and related beliefs. The mixed methods mental model approach proved to be a promising practical tool for the effective and efficient elicitation of actors’ perspectives in decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Raphael Gaus & Adrienne Grêt-Regamey & Matthias Buchecker, 2021. "Eliciting actors’ perspectives in integrated watershed management: exploring a practical tool based on a mental model approach," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(8), pages 1352-1374, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:64:y:2021:i:8:p:1352-1374
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2020.1823343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2020.1823343
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2020.1823343?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:64:y:2021:i:8:p:1352-1374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.