IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v64y2021i4p649-670.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government-industry dynamics in the development of offshore waste management in Norway: from prescriptive to risk-based regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Maaike Knol-Kauffman
  • Ann-Magnhild Solås
  • Peter Arbo

Abstract

Petroleum activities are associated with high risks. In the 1980s, concerns arose about the environmental impacts of ‘normal’ petroleum activity. Regular operations go hand-in-hand with emissions to air and discharges to sea. Both have been subject to extensive regulation since the 1990s. This paper analyzes the design and implementation of the Norwegian system that regulates operational discharges to the marine environment. It analyzes the changing relationships among science, politics and the industry and describes how the turn from a prescriptive to a predominantly performance-based approach was fundamental in making progress toward less polluting practices. The article describes how risk regulation was institutionalized and highlights the benefits of involving the industry in the pursuit of environmental protection. It also cautions against a lax attitude toward control and oversight, as complexification of risk objects and the increase of institutional risks can lead to mismatches in risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Maaike Knol-Kauffman & Ann-Magnhild Solås & Peter Arbo, 2021. "Government-industry dynamics in the development of offshore waste management in Norway: from prescriptive to risk-based regulation," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(4), pages 649-670, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:64:y:2021:i:4:p:649-670
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2020.1779676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2020.1779676
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2020.1779676?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:64:y:2021:i:4:p:649-670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.