IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v64y2021i2p289-307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder perceptions of public good provision from agriculture and implications for governance mechanism design

Author

Listed:
  • Michaela Roberts
  • Anja Byg
  • Michela Faccioli
  • Paula Novo
  • Carol Kyle

Abstract

Agriculture provides many public goods; however the costs and benefits of these are rarely well distributed. Maintaining public good provision often relies on external governance mechanisms, in turn reliant on the existing socio-ecological system. With two groups of stakeholders (practitioners and academics) we created cognitive maps of socio-ecological systems linking agriculture, public goods, and governance mechanisms in north-east Scotland. Fuzzy cognitive mapping was used to explore stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences, and to assess alternative governance options for the local socio-ecological context. We find agreement for perceptions of the system between stakeholders, but differences in each group’s focus. Models predicted little change in the provision of public goods from agriculture in relation to different governance mechanisms. We find that stakeholder participation can aid understanding of the impacts of proposed governance changes at the local level, improving comprehension of stakeholder perception of impacts and understanding of stakeholders’ reactions to particular governance mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Michaela Roberts & Anja Byg & Michela Faccioli & Paula Novo & Carol Kyle, 2021. "Stakeholder perceptions of public good provision from agriculture and implications for governance mechanism design," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(2), pages 289-307, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:64:y:2021:i:2:p:289-307
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2020.1763274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2020.1763274
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2020.1763274?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:64:y:2021:i:2:p:289-307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.