IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v62y2019i9p1636-1653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A framework to assess the performance of participatory planning tools for strategic delta planning

Author

Listed:
  • J. Evers
  • W. Douven
  • J. Van der Stroom
  • S. Hasan
  • C. Seijger
  • H.L. Phi

Abstract

Participatory planning tools are increasingly applied in strategic delta planning processes. Additional to its design criteria, such tools commonly promote a variety of aspects including (1) facilitation of communication, (2) knowledge sharing, (3) social learning, (4) decreasing differences in power, (5) integration between sectors, and (6) supporting agreements. Yet tools are rarely assessed systematically on these participatory process dimensions. This paper presents a participatory planning tool assessment framework. The paper shows how the framework is tested on its usefulness in a training workshop on participatory planning tools for strategic delta planning. It is concluded that the framework offers potential to assess participatory planning tools beyond a tool’s technological design criteria and that it can contribute to advancing our knowledge on the performance of tools in participatory planning activities.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Evers & W. Douven & J. Van der Stroom & S. Hasan & C. Seijger & H.L. Phi, 2019. "A framework to assess the performance of participatory planning tools for strategic delta planning," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(9), pages 1636-1653, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:62:y:2019:i:9:p:1636-1653
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2019.1603843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2019.1603843
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2019.1603843?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:62:y:2019:i:9:p:1636-1653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.