IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v62y2019i14p2418-2436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing stormwater runoff in Appalachia: what does the public think?

Author

Listed:
  • Kristan Cockerill
  • Tanga Mohr
  • William P. Anderson
  • Peter Groothuis
  • Chuanhui Gu
  • John Whitehead

Abstract

As concerns about urban stormwater runoff become more acute and decentralized management gains popularity, there is a need to better understand public attitudes about stormwater management. We surveyed residents in Appalachia to assess knowledge about stormwater runoff, concerns about impacts, efforts to abate runoff on private property, and attitudes towards who should manage and pay for management. The survey also employed a split sample technique to assess how detailed, science-based information documenting negative impacts influences public concern and attitudes toward stormwater management. The results show the majority of respondents know what stormwater runoff is, but they know less about what its impacts are. About a third of respondents have implemented stormwater abatement measures on their property. There is no consensus on who should manage or pay for stormwater management. Providing more detailed science-based information had no influence on respondents’ general concern about stormwater runoff or their attitudes about its management.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristan Cockerill & Tanga Mohr & William P. Anderson & Peter Groothuis & Chuanhui Gu & John Whitehead, 2019. "Managing stormwater runoff in Appalachia: what does the public think?," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(14), pages 2418-2436, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:62:y:2019:i:14:p:2418-2436
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2018.1559803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2018.1559803
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2018.1559803?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:62:y:2019:i:14:p:2418-2436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.