IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v45y2002i2p245-265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Army Training: The Environmental Gains Resulting from the Adoption of Alternatives to Traditional Training Methods

Author

Listed:
  • David Doxford
  • Alan Judd

Abstract

This paper describes several alternatives to traditional methods of army training on dedicated ranges using live, full-calibre ammunition. These are: training/sub-calibre ammunition; training over private land; live or engagement simulation; virtual reality (VR) simulation; constructive simulation; and mechanical simulation. The advantages and disadvantages of each are examined with respect to military and environmental considerations. Varied examples from the British, US and Swiss armies are used to examine the future role of these alternative approaches in meeting a fast-changing training requirement within multiplying environmental controls and resource constraints. This paper concentrates particularly on the training requirements of artillery systems because these are amongst the most demanding in resource terms. The three cited nations operate similar artillery systems and are subject to similar constraints. The US Army's move towards simulation has been triggered largely by economic and operational factors along with tightening regulatory controls. The Swiss and British forces are highly constrained by space, the British due to population density and the Swiss due to topography. While all the alternatives offer environmental and resource advantages, VR simulation provides the most positive benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • David Doxford & Alan Judd, 2002. "Army Training: The Environmental Gains Resulting from the Adoption of Alternatives to Traditional Training Methods," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 245-265.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:45:y:2002:i:2:p:245-265
    DOI: 10.1080/09640560220116323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09640560220116323
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640560220116323?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:45:y:2002:i:2:p:245-265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.