IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jeduce/v50y2019i4p371-387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scalable, scaffolded writing assignments with online peer review in a large introductory economics course

Author

Listed:
  • Avi J. Cohen
  • Andrea L. Williams

Abstract

Despite widely acknowledged benefits of integrating writing into economics courses, instructors’ costs are often prohibitive. To reduce costs and make writing assignments more feasible, the authors describe multi-part, scaffolded writing assignments developed by an economist and a WAC (Writing Across the Curriculum) specialist, integrated into an 800-student introductory economics course with multilingual students and TAs. Students draft and revise an abstract and later draft and write an op-ed with a convincing economic argument for a general audience. The authors use writing centers and peer review software to provide feedback while reducing grading time, and train inexperienced TAs to evaluate student writing through detailed rubrics and moderated marking sessions. They provide detailed assignment descriptions and an accounting of resources and time needed to grade each assignment.

Suggested Citation

  • Avi J. Cohen & Andrea L. Williams, 2019. "Scalable, scaffolded writing assignments with online peer review in a large introductory economics course," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(4), pages 371-387, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:50:y:2019:i:4:p:371-387
    DOI: 10.1080/00220485.2019.1654951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220485.2019.1654951
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220485.2019.1654951?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarah A. Jacobson & Luyao Zhang & Jiasheng Zhu, 2022. "The Right Tool for the Job: Matching Active Learning Techniques to Learning Objectives," Papers 2205.03393, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:50:y:2019:i:4:p:371-387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/VECE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.