IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jecmet/v25y2018i4p349-366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying central banks’ scientization: why and how to do a quantified organizational history of economics

Author

Listed:
  • François Claveau
  • Jérémie Dion

Abstract

A subset of research in the history of economics is organizational history – i.e. the study of the organizations producing, circulating and applying economic ideas. This article maintains that some research questions in organizational history call for quantitative methods because they ask about magnitudes. More precisely, we claim that quantitative methods should complement rather than replace other research methods when the research question is at least partly about magnitudes. We walk the walk with a study of one type of organization, central banks, and of its changing relationship with economic science. Our results point unambiguously toward a growing dominance of central banks in the specialized field of monetary economics. Central banks have swelling research armies, they publish a growing share of the articles in specialized scholarly journals, and these articles tend to have more impact today than the articles produced outside central banks.

Suggested Citation

  • François Claveau & Jérémie Dion, 2018. "Quantifying central banks’ scientization: why and how to do a quantified organizational history of economics," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 349-366, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:25:y:2018:i:4:p:349-366
    DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2018.1529216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1350178X.2018.1529216
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1350178X.2018.1529216?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Acosta, Juan & Cherrier, Beatrice, 2021. "The Transformation Of Economic Analysis At The Board Of Governors Of The Federal Reserve System During The 1960s," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 323-349, September.
    2. Juan Acosta & Beatrice Cherrier & François Claveau & Clément Fontan & Francesco Sergi & Aurélien Goutsmedt, 2023. "Six Decades of Economic Research at the Bank of England," Post-Print hal-03919394, HAL.
    3. Aurélien Goutsmedt & Matthieu Renault & Francesco Sergi, 2021. "European Economics and the Early Years of the International Seminar on Macroeconomics," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 131(4), pages 693-722.
    4. Jakub Rybacki & Dobromił Serwa, 2021. "What Makes a Successful Scientist in a Central Bank? Evidence From the RePEc Database," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 13(3), pages 331-357, September.
    5. Acosta, Juan & Assistant, JHET, 2021. "Book Review of 'Banks and Finance in Modern Macroeconomics' by Claudio Sardoni and Bruna Ingrao," OSF Preprints kfxhy, Center for Open Science.
    6. Acosta, Juan & Cherrier, Beatrice, 2018. "The transformation of economic analysis at the Federal Reserve during the 1960s," SocArXiv vdy2z, Center for Open Science.
    7. Goutsmedt, Aurélien & Sergi, Francesco & Claveau, François & Fontan, Clément, 2023. "The Different Paths of Central Bank Scientization: The Case of the Bank of England," SocArXiv jzwdt, Center for Open Science.
    8. Bakeev, M., 2022. "A compromise between formalism and realism as a way to influence economic policy," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 57(5), pages 113-125.
    9. Thiago Dumont Oliveira & Marwil J. Dávila-Fernández, 2020. "From modelmania to datanomics? The rise of mathematical and quantitative methods in three top economics journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(1), pages 51-70, April.
    10. Francesco Sergi, 2020. "The Standard Narrative about DSGE Models in Central Banks’ Technical Reports," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 163-193, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:25:y:2018:i:4:p:349-366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.