IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jecmet/v25y2018i4p291-310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison between qualitative and quantitative histories: the example of the efficient market hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Franck Jovanovic

Abstract

This paper uses the example of the history of the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) and citation analysis in order to investigate some differences between qualitative history and a quantitative history. The history of the EMH provides a telling example of the way quantitative analyses can supply different perspectives on the qualitative history of this hypothesis or complement it. For instance, since the EMH was proposed, several criticisms emerged. In addition, the definition and the scope of this hypothesis have been modified several times. Although the qualitative history of the EMH refers to these criticisms and these alternative definitions and scopes, qualitative tools cannot provide a clear measure of the impact of these criticisms and these modifications among economists. By studying the dissemination of the EMH, its major criticisms, and the answers economists provided, citation analysis sheds a different light on the history of the EMH.

Suggested Citation

  • Franck Jovanovic, 2018. "A comparison between qualitative and quantitative histories: the example of the efficient market hypothesis," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 291-310, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:25:y:2018:i:4:p:291-310
    DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2018.1529135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1350178X.2018.1529135
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1350178X.2018.1529135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Un, Kuok Sin & Ausloos, Marcel, 2022. "Equity premium prediction: Taking into account the role of long, even asymmetric, swings in stock market behavior," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 608(P1).
    2. Lima, Pedro G. & Teixeira, Pedro N. & Silva, Sandra T., 2021. "Major Streams in the Economics of Inequality: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of the Literature since 1950s," IZA Discussion Papers 14777, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Rebecca Pham & Marcel Ausloos, 2022. "Insider trading in the run‐up to merger announcements. Before and after the UK's Financial Services Act 2012," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3373-3385, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:25:y:2018:i:4:p:291-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.